Your cache administrator is webmaster. Probably the best thing to say would be that using more complete statistical analysis can help characterize performance more accurately and precisely. PPDBs are sets of geodetically controlled pho-tographic materials, accompanying data, and computer programs which enable trained personnel to derive accurate coordinates for any identifiable ground feature within the database area. Although the terms precision and accuracy are often used inter-changeably, there is an important difference between them. "Precision" is the closeness with which repeated measurements made under similar conditions are grouped http://allsoftwarereviews.com/circular-error/circular-error-probable-cep.php
Ask questions, get answers. PPDB accuracy is estimated for the entire coverage. saetechnologies.com - Colorway Wordpress Theme by InkThemes.com Circular error probable From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search "Circular error" redirects here. The CEP, however, is a measure of how close the impacts are likely to be to the target - given some assumed distribution - and thus is a valid concept no http://www.saetechnologies.com/circular-error-probable-rational/
Now assuming this information is to be used by competitive shooters. He even has gunsmithing tools named after him and it hasn't hurt the sport any. You MEASURE them, ALL of them. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Finally, a set of statistical data, including the set in the above quote, will tell you more than just if your groups "suck". However, given the amount of effort and money spent trying to make groups just that much smaller I would think any information which could help do that would be useful. That's not easy. -Bryan C'mon Bryan, Where do you guys get this stuff? I'm in the dark here.
There is not enough time to do everything that might be beneficial, so we have to make choices. CEP is not based on a normal distribution. The math geeks will always argue that SD results in "more accurate results" but ONE dropped shot due to bad ES will most certainly ruin your day in competition. more info here So did the device really produce an improvement?
How did the groups improve without statistical data....I looked at the bullet holes in the first target to improve the second to see if seating depth was right, I looked at ComputerGeezer (talk) 00:42, 21 August 2008 (UTC) Math errors on this page The formula given in the last paragraph of this page, at least as I understand it, can't be right. The paper doesn't explicitly go into it, but what you are suggesting is contained in the "CEP". ComcastWashington state vs.
People may decide not to use that information, but that doesn't mean it's not there. this content Error Budget Concept 13.3.4. If you really want to know how much effect variable 'x' has on your precision, you have some choices for how to investigate that variable. It takes more effort in the short run, but saves money and time in the long run. ...
Buy the Full Version You're Reading a Free Preview Pages 31 to 100 are not shown in this preview. his comment is here bsl13512-08-2008, 06:09 PMI don't think anyone could have said it better (with more or less words:)) Thanks for taking the time to give such an in depth explanation. -Bryan Boyd Allen12-08-2008, Compared to CEP, this would weight all shots (as CEP does with its median radius), but would also characterize the scatter of the shots. Of course the two measures are related.
It's relevant because precision measurement is valuable! IP This user thinks that accounts are overrated and would much rather edit from an IP address. ± 184.108.40.206 (talk) 18:02, 30 December 2015 (UTC) Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Circular_error_probable&oldid=734857409" Depending on the errors that perturb the ballistic missile from its intended trajectory, you could get all kinds of distributions at "impact". this contact form Do you think I should consider the pendulum definition primary and have a hatnote to this page?
state AG vs. It is in fact a much more general statistic that doesn't pre-suppose and underlying statistical distribution. While the paper is, of necessity, somewhat mathematical, it should be fairly clear even if it's been a while since your last math course.
Most competitive shooters shoot in varying conditions in vary geographical locations. Coordinate reference systems are a shorthand means of communicating location on the earth's surface. The common c-t-c (extreme spread) statistic for group size is very nice in that it can be done simply and quickly with minimal calculation and it's very easy to visualize. NIMA currently does not plan to create another WGS- XX. 98 98 Page 99 100 99 13.3.
But at first glance, CEP, while an improvement, still seems somewhat arbitrary. The 50% Circular Error Probable (CEP) fig-ure is the radius of a circle around the target within which 50% of the weapons should fall. Accurate coordinates and their conversion to a frame of reference usable by the strike system are required because it affects the system and its means of employment (tactics). http://allsoftwarereviews.com/circular-error/circular-error-probable-definition.php The same is true of land-based weapons.
To incorporate accuracy into the CEP concept in these conditions, CEP can be defined as the square root of the mean square error (MSE). Precision-guided munitions generally have more "close misses" and so are not normally distributed. It is only because they impact the ground at an angle that the munition impact points are elliptical. These guys have brought it into the light and made it relevant and comprehensible to us.